Explore how music can influence certain sensory experiences and what research contributes to designing atmospheres for your business.
Some spaces are remembered as a single impression. Not because of an individual song or a particular dish, but as a whole: the light seemed warmer, the aroma drifted naturally, and conversation found just the right rhythm. Within that unified perception, music does more than serve as background. It acts as a force that organizes the experience.
Strictly speaking, synesthesia involves additional, involuntary, consistent experiences, such as perceiving colors when hearing music. Simner and colleagues (2006) estimated a prevalence of 4.4% for the different forms of synesthesia identified in a university sample. That figure does not describe musical synesthesia alone or a universal proportion of the population. For those who design experiences, a different phenomenon also matters:
People without synesthesia can also make associations between sound, color, texture, or taste. These crossmodal correspondences are not the same as involuntarily seeing colors when hearing music. In curation, they invite us to consider music in relation to what customers see, touch, smell, and taste.
Key definition: Crossmodal correspondences are associations between stimuli from different sensory modalities. Palmer and colleagues (2013) observed music-color associations mediated by shared emotions. The experiment concerned color choices and associations, not physical or visual changes to a space’s walls.
Studies show interactions between sound and other sensory modalities under specific experimental conditions. Their findings concern associations or perceptual judgments, not physical changes to the surroundings:
Key insight: A meta-analysis of 130 neuroimaging studies of music perception, production, and imagery found involvement of auditory and sensorimotor cortices in music perception and production. It does not, by itself, establish changes in how materials, aromas, or commercial spaces are perceived.
| Traditional approach (unisensory) | Multisensory approach (Music Curator) |
|---|---|
| Music is designed for the ear alone | Music is designed in relation to light, aroma, and texture |
| Stimuli are managed separately | Emotional coherence across all senses is sought |
| Risk of friction (e.g., warm light + cold music) | Coherence between music and visual and olfactory identity is sought |
| The customer may perceive separate parts | A complete, coherent atmosphere is sought |
Strategic conclusion: From a design perspective, it is useful to consider whether visual identity and music selection tell the same story. A bright visual identity and dense music may coexist or create tension, depending on the context. Music curation helps shape that relationship without applying a universal rule about what every customer will perceive.
The following proposals are principles for contextual design. They do not describe effects guaranteed by the preceding experiments; they need to fit the space, audience, and intended experience.
Multisensory research shows that listening can relate to color associations and judgments of touch, odors, or taste under specific conditions. Its contribution to design lies in considering music within the experience as a whole, rather than promising universal transformations.
Ultimately, that is the difference between playing music and designing an experience.
Playing music fills the silence.
Designing an experience means relating music to the other sensory decisions to create an atmosphere with identity.
When all the senses converge coherently, diners or customers do not perceive separate parts. They perceive a single experience. And that is something no algorithm can achieve without human intention.
At Music Curator, we create professional soundscapes that engage with your brand’s visual and sensory identity. If you want to transform the perception of your space through music, contact us for a personalized consultation.